33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, be certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Case regulation is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For example, a ruling inside of a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded on the allegations as such they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
For that foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised of the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had very little to fret about.
However it really is made crystal clear that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also assure regard on the family drop in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security in the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been achieved. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is usually a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic for the divorce law case study procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the regulation laid down with the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority with the parent department with the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, making sure a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of previous resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For most reasons, such appeals are often not granted.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are proven by executive businesses based on statutes.